Bonjour,Nous discutons actuellement

Bonjour,

Nous discutons actuellement avec HHIC de l’arrangement des trunks permettant d’accéder au Bilge well arrière de la cale 3.

La proposition du chantier est de faire des trunks totalement fermé, ventilé seulement avec de tuyaux 65mm, et avec pour seul drain une plug dirigé vers le BW.

Nous sommes surprise de la position de KPO qui semble supporter ce design, que nous trouvons innaceptable.

Nous demandons au chantier a ouvrir ces trunks vers la cale (plus besoin de ventilation forcée) et à appliquer un système de drain correct.

Pourriez-vous clarifier la position du BV et supporter notre position sur ce point.

Cordialement,

Antoine DERELY, Newbuilding Team Leader / Naval Architect

결과 (영어) 1:

HelloWe are discussing with HHIC of the arrangement of the trunks to access the rear well for 3 hold Bilge.Site proposal is to make the trunks completely closed, ventilated only with 65mm pipes, and with for only drain a plug directed to the BW.We are surprised by the position of KPO which seems to support this design, which we find unacceptable.We ask the site to open these trunks to hold (more need for forced ventilation) and apply a correct drain system.Could you clarify the position of the BV and support our position on this point.Kind regardsAntoine DERELY, Newbuilding Team Leader / Naval Architect

결과 (영어) 2:

Hello,

We are currently discussing with the Arrangement HHIC trunks providing access to Bilge well back of the wedge 3.

The proposal of the project is to make totally enclosed trunks, broken only with 65mm pipes, and with only drain a plug directed to the BW.

We are surprised by the position of KPO which seems to support this design, we find innaceptable.

We ask the shipyard open these trunks to the dock (no need for forced ventilation) and to apply a system of drain properly.

Could you clarify the position of BV and support our position on this.

Regards,

Antoine DERELY, Newbuilding Team Leader / Naval Architect

결과 (영어) 3:

good morning,we are currently discussing with hhic arrangement of the trunks, permitting access to the bilge well back of the deck 3.the proposal of the site is fully closed to trunks, broken down to 65mm pipes and drain plug for a directed to bw.we are surprised at the position of kpo that seems to support this design, which we find unacceptable.we call the site open these trunks to the consumption need of forced ventilation and to apply a proper drain system.could you clarify the position of bv and support our position on this point.yours sincerely,antoine derely, newbuilding team leader / naval architect